Priorizar el diálogo con jóvenes: La clave para un futuro digital saludable

Publicidad

As a member of Generation Z, social media has had a profound impact on my life in numerous ways. Having been born just 10 months before the introduction of Facebook, I have experienced every moment of my life, from my first steps captured on my mother’s Facebook page. I have never known a world without social media, and to me, it is not just a means of entertainment but a vital tool for connection and education.

It is crucial for young people to be educated on how to navigate the complexities of social media rather than being prohibited from using it altogether. The recent proposal by the Albanese government to ban minors under the age of 16 from all social media platforms is not only shortsighted but also detrimental to the well-being and development of young people. These platforms serve as a primary source of news for a majority of teenagers and children, playing a crucial role in shaping their understanding of the world and empowering them to be active participants in society.

While it is important to recognize the responsibility of social media companies to promote respectful and non-toxic content, banning young people from using these platforms is not the solution. Instead, it is an opportunity to provide them with the necessary education and skills to engage in a healthy and respectful manner online. The government’s proposal to establish a “digital duty of care” is a step in the right direction, but it must be done in consultation with young people and take into account their perspectives and experiences.

It is essential to listen to the voices of young people and involve them in the decision-making process when it comes to policies that directly impact them. Anthony Albanese’s assertion that he has engaged in discussions with thousands of parents and adults about the social media age restriction is commendable, but where was the input from young people themselves? It is unacceptable to implement policies that affect young people without their input and engagement.

Social media has also become a powerful platform for student activism, enabling young people to connect with like-minded individuals, educate themselves on important issues, and mobilize for positive change. As a youth activist, I have witnessed firsthand the impact that social media can have in raising awareness and advocating for change. Our Instagram and TikTok accounts have been instrumental in reaching a wide audience and engaging them in important discussions on issues that directly affect them.

By restricting young people from using social media, you are not only isolating them but also denying them the opportunity to develop important skills for the future. Student activism is crucial for any democracy, and by limiting young people’s ability to engage in political discourse and online activism, you are hindering their personal and political agency.

Instead of imposing bans, we should work together with young people to create a platform that allows individuals of all ages to engage in a safe and respectful manner. By empowering young people to use social media responsibly, we can ensure that they are equipped with the skills and knowledge to navigate the digital world effectively and contribute positively to society.

In conclusion, Anthony Albanese should prioritize listening to young people and involving them in the decision-making process when it comes to social media policies. Rather than banning young people from using social media, we should focus on providing them with the necessary education and support to use these platforms responsibly. By working together with young people, we can create a safe and inclusive online environment that fosters their growth and development for the present and the future.